Living close to nature improves brain health

Living close to nature improves brain health

Research has demonstrated multiple times that exposure to the outdoors can reduce stress in humans.

Now, yet another research study has shown that spending more time outside can help prevent psychological suffering. Living nearer to both green (outdoor places, parks, forests) and blue (bodies of water) environments may lower the likelihood of older persons having severe psychological discomfort, according to Washington State University researchers.

Stress can lead to mild cognitive impairment and the start of dementia in older people.

Any mental health issues that necessitate treatment or have a moderate-to-severe impact on a person’s ability to engage in a job, school and any other social situations were described by the study’s authors as psychological distress. During the course of this investigation, the team evaluated 42,980 seniors who resided in urban regions of the state of Washington.

Since we lack effective prevention methods or treatments for mild cognitive impairment and dementia, we need to get creative in how we look at these issues,” said Solmaz Amiri, DDes, of Washington State University Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine in Spokane, Washington, in a media release.

“Our hope is that this study showing better mental health among people living close to parks and water will trigger other studies about how these benefits work and whether this proximity can help prevent or delay mild cognitive impairment and dementia.”

The research team attempted to determine how close individuals resided to either green or blue spaces using data previously acquired by the US Census and the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention. Green places for this study included adjacent city parks, neighborhood gardens, and even cemeteries. Every body of water, including a lake, reservoir, sizable river, and ocean, was considered a blue space.

Why does it help the brain?

Every subject filled out a questionnaire to gauge their level of psychological distress. Six items on a five-point scale were included in the surveys and asked participants how frequently they experienced symptoms of sadness and anxiety.

The number of days they were unable to work owing to psychological anguish, the number of days their output was reduced by half, and the frequency with which they sought professional treatment were all also among the queries. The scores for these tests ranged from 0 to 24, with an average of 2.

Related posts

The doctors selling bogus treatments to people

The doctors selling bogus treatments to people facing blindness Doctors around the world are…
Read more

VC of GCWUF terms exercise vital for

VC of GCWUF terms exercise vital for human health Exercise is very important for mental and…
Read more

Heart disease: Is this protein test a better

Heart disease: Is this protein test a better predictor of risk than cholesterol levels? The test…
Read more
Become a Trendsetter

Sign up for StayConnecting Daily Digest and get the best of StayConnecting, tailored for you.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *